Translate

Thursday, 19 July 2012


DHARAMSHALA: A two-member Australian Parliamentary delegation visited the Tibetan community in Dharamsala from 10 – 13 July.

Senators Lisa Singh-MP, Labour Party and Larissa Waters-MP, Green Party, met the standing committee of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile. Speaker Penpa Tsering briefed the two senators about the critical situation inside Tibet
and appealed to them to support the just cause of Tibet. The Tibetan Parliament hosted a dinner reception and a cultural performance at the Tibetan Institute of Performing Arts in their honour, the Tibetan Parliament said in a statement on its website.

The senators also met Kalon Tripa Dr Lobsang Sangay and Dicki Chhoyang, Kalon for the Department of Information & International Relations of the Central Tibetan Administration.

They visited Tibetan cultural, religious and educational institutions, and all spectrum of Tibetan civil society in and around Dharamsala.

The senators said they would impress upon the Australian government and their allies to engage the Chinese government in resolving the issue of Tibet.

Senator Lisa Singh is a Labor party MP from Tasmania. She is the first person of South Asian decent to be elected to the Australian Parliament in 2010. She is a member of the Australian All-Party Parliamentary Group for Tibet. She met His Holiness the Dalai Lama in her home state of Tasmania. In March 2012 she met a group of Tibetan representatives in her office as part of the Tibet Advocacy Project, and has recently joined the Australian All-Party Parliamentary Group for Tibet.

Senator Larissa Waters is a Greens party senator from Queensland since 2010. She has met local Tibetans in her office in Brisbane.

Monday, 25 June 2012



(ABC) MELBOURNE: The Prime Minister of the Tibetan government-in-exile is in Melbourne, and he will use his first official Australian visit to seek support for his plan for a peaceful resolution to the Tibetan crisis.
Lobsang Sangay was elected as leader of the Central Tibetan Administration after the Dalai Lama retired from political life last year.
He will head to Canberra and Sydney over the next week.
Doctor Sangay says he believes there will be a resolution to the issues facing Tibet.
“The Berlin Wall came down, Nelson Mandela, 27 years in prison, no-one thought he could be freed,” he said.
“Gaddafi is gone and Hosni Mubarak.
“Aung San Suu Kyi just got released, she swept the 44 seats in the Parliament, just received her Nobel Peace prize so I’m in that world where someone says it’s impossible, very difficult, I say it’s possible.”
He says he will speak to Australian political leaders about the worsening humanitarian situation in Tibet.
“You can’t have rallies, you can’t have demonstrations,” he said.
“Even posting posters on a wall can have you arrested and tortured, often disappear.
“The situation inside Tibet is so oppressive that Tibetans are choosing to die.
“The Chinese Government seems to be cracking down more and now they have closed off Tibetan areas for tourists also.”
He says a request to meet Australia’s Foreign Minister Bob Carr has so fare been rebuffed.
“Obviously the Australian leaders ought to listen to the Chinese Government and Chinese leaders, but at the same time, it’s only fair that you listen to other side as well,” he said.

Thursday, 21 June 2012

His Holiness the Dalai Lama


China belongs to its 1.3 billion people not to the Communist Party: His Holiness the Dalai Lama





June 21, 2012 11:38 am
Speaking at the University of Westminster where he had been invited to give the CR Parekh Lecture on the Values of Democracy and Tibet, His Holiness said “Look at India and China, both have huge populations, but the difference is that India is a democracy with a functioning judiciary, a country where there is freedom of speech and a free press. Meanwhile, the Chinese communist party are so concerned about the disintegration of their country that they forcefully restrict the unique aspects of minority groups. I recommend Chinese I meet to look at pluralistic India and learn from it”
His Holiness asserted that, just as America belongs to its 300 or so million citizens, not to either the Republican or Democratic parties, and China belongs to its 1.3 billion people not to the Communist Party, the world belongs to the 7 billion people who live here. He said democracy is the best way for a country to be ruled by its people for its people.
For one thing, leaders who are elected are necessarily accountable. In this context he said, the 1.3 billion Chinese people have a right to know the reality of their situation and, on that basis, have the ability to know right from wrong and take their own decisions. However, he quoted a friend who had observed that in New Zealand, a country of only 3 million, power is in the hands of all the people, whereas in China with its population of 1.3 billion, power is in the hand of only nine men.
Addressing representatives of NGOs and Tibet Support Groups shortly afterwards, he was asked whether it was better to support the preservation of Tibetan culture or to take up political issues. He asked in return what is the main factor that has kept the Tibetan spirit alive and suggested that it was Tibetan Buddhist Culture.

He also made the interesting point that the Tibetan exile administration has referred to the Three Provinces of Tibet since they were in the transit camp at Misamari in Assam in 1959. The term Greater Tibet that seems to so enrage the Chinese is in fact a Chinese invention. He said that to recognise only the so called Tibet Autonomous Region as Tibet would mean that he, the Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament in Exile, who was sitting next to him, and several others in the room would no longer count as Tibetans. Moreover, the entire 6 million Tibetan people participate in and employ Tibetan literature and its language. He expressed his appreciation of the work Tibet Support Groups and allied NGOs do and requested them to continue.
After lunch His Holiness gave an interview to the BBC’s Andrew Marr in the course of which they discussed the history and future of the lineage of Dalai Lamas, His Holiness’s meetings with Chairman Mao Zedong, whether he might have worked more effectively for Tibet if he hadn’t escaped and the implications of the present spate of self-immolations in Tibet.
At the Royal Albert Hall, nearly 6000 people gave His Holiness a rousing welcome.
Tomorrow, His Holiness will speak at the London School of Economics about Resisting Intolerance: an Ethical and Global Challenge, and will attend an inter-religious gathering at Westminster Abbey and meet with Parliamentarians at the Palace of Westminster.

Pictures from Tibet


Pictures from Tibet


Tibetan Singers
Poster from a hometown festival
Pictures of the winners of the Horse racing



Picture of a child minding his beloved dog

Wednesday, 20 June 2012

བོད་མི་ ༢ ཀྱིས་མེར་བསྲེགས།


བོད་མི་ ༢ ཀྱིས་མེར་བསྲེགས།

འདོན་སྤེལ། ༢༠༡༢/༠༦/༢༠

དེ་རིང་ཕྱི་དྲོ་ཁམས་ཡུལ་ཤུལ་ཁུལ་རྫ་སྟོད་གྲོང་རྡལ་དུ་བོད་མི་གཉིས་ཀྱིས་རང་ལུས་མེར་བསྲེགས་ཀྱིས་རྒྱ་གཞུང་ལ་ངོ་རྒོལ་བྱས་འདུག

རྒྱ་གར་ལྷོ་ཕྱོགས་སེར་བྱེས་ལྡན་མ་ཁང་ཚན་གྱི་གྲྭ་བློ་བཟང་སངས་རྒྱས་ལགས་ཀྱིས་འདི་གར་གནས་ཚུལ་མཁོ་སྤྲོད་བྱས་པ་ལྟར་ན། དེ་རིང་ཕྱི་ཚེས་ ༢༠ ཉིན་གྱི་བོད་ནང་གི་ཕྱི་དྲོའི་ཆུ་ཚོད་།༣༠ ཐོག་རང་ལོ་ ༢༢ ཡིན་པའི་ངག་དབང་ནོར་འཕེལ་དང་། རང་ལོ་ ༢༤ ཡིན་པའི་བསྟན་འཛིན་མཁས་གྲུབ་གཉིས་ཀྱིས་ཁམས་ཡུལ་ཤུལ་རྫ་སྟོད་གྲོང་རྡལ་དུ་རང་ལུས་མེར་བསྲེགས་ཀྱིས་རྒྱ་གཞུང་ལ་ངོ་རྒོལ་བྱས་འདུག  

གནས་ཚུལ་ཤེས་རྟོགས་བྱུང་བ་ལྟར་ན། ངག་དབང་ནོར་འཕེལ་ནི་ཨ་མདོ་རྔ་བ་རྫོང་གི་ཡིན་འདུག་ལ། ཕ་མིང་ལ་ལྷཔ་དོན་འགྲུབ་དང་ཨ་མའི་མིང་ལ་ཚེ་རིང་དབྱངས་ཅན་འབོད་ཀྱི་ཡོད་འདུག ལོ་ཤས་གོང་རྫ་སྟོད་དུ་ཡོང་སྟེ་བསྡད་ཡོད་འདུག བསྟན་འཛིན་མཁས་གྲུབ་ལགས་ནི། ཁམས་ཡུལ་ཤུལ་ཁུལ་ཁྲི་འདུ་རྫོང་ཉ་མཚོ་སྡེ་བའི་སྐམ་ཡུལ་རུ་ཁག་གསུམ་པ་ནས་ཡིན་ཞིང་ཕ་མིང་ལ་ལེགས་གྲུབ་དང་མ་སྐྱིད་འཛོམས་དེ་སྔོན་ཟིལ་དཀར་དགོན་གྱི་གྲྭ་བ་ཡིན་ལ་ཉིས་སྟོང་དྲུག་ལོར་སྐྱ་སར་བབས་འདུག



ཉེ་ཆར་ཁོང་གཉིས་ཀྱིས་མེར་བསྲེགས་མ་བཏང་བའི་སྔོན་དུ་ཞལ་ཆེམས་ཡི་གེ་ཅིག་བཞག་ཡོད་པའི་ནང་། ངེད་གཉིས་ལ་མཚོན་ན་བོད་ཀྱི་ཆོས་དང་རིག་གནས་སོགས་གང་ལ་ཡང་ནུས་པ་འདོན་མི་ཐུབ་ཅིང་། དཔལ་འབྱོར་གྱི་ཕྱོགས་ནས་བོད་མི་མང་ལ་ཕན་པའི་ལས་ཀ་ཅི་ཡང་བྱེད་མི་ཐུབ། དེའི་ཕྱིར་ངེད་གཉིས་ཀྱིས་རང་གི་ནུས་ཚོད་ཀྱིས་བོད་མི་རིགས་དང་ལྷག་པར་དུ་༸གོང་ས་མཆོག་སྐུ་ཚེ་ཁྲི་ཕྲག་ནས་ཁྲི་ཕྲག་ཏུ་བརྟན་པ་དང་། གཞན་ཡང་ཁོང་མྱུར་དུ་བོད་ལ་ཞབས་སོར་ཐུབ་པའི་རམ་འདེགས་སུ་རང་ལུས་མེར་བསྲེགས་ཀྱི་ལས་གཞི་འདི་འདེམས་པ་ཡིན། ངེད་གཉིས་དང་འདྲ་བའི་བོད་ཀྱི་གཞོན་སྐྱེས་ཚོར་ཞུ་སྙིང་། ང་ཚོའི་བོད་ནང་ཁུལ་ནས་རྒྱག་རེས་རྒྱག་རྒྱུ་དང་། ནང་རྩོད་བྱེད་རྒྱུའི་བྱ་སྤྱོད་རིགས་ནམ་ཡང་མ་བྱེད་པའི་དམ་བཅའ་དང་། ཚང་མས་རྡོག་རྩ་གཅིག་སྒྲིལ་གྱིས་བོད་མི་རིགས་ཀྱི་ལ་རྒྱ་འཛིན་ཐུབ་རྒྱུའི་རེ་བ་དང་ཡིད་ཆེས་ཡོད་ཅེས་འཁོད་འདུག

Two youths self-immolate in Tibet

Calling for Dalai Lama’s return, two youths self-immolate in Tibet


zatod2June 20: Barely a week after an elderly Tibetan nomad burned himself to death,
two youth set themselves on fire in anti-China protest today in Yushul Tibet Autonomous Prefecture in Qinghai Province.

Ngawang Norphel (22) and Tenzin Khedup (24) set their bodies on fire in Zatoe town in Yushul around 3:30 pm (local time), according to Lobsang Sangay, a Tibetan monk, who cited sources in the region. Khedup reportedly died after the protest while Norphel is believed to have survived and remained in hospital.

A short video clip, purported to be of the duo’s self-immolation, shows the two youths, both carrying a Tibetan national flag, engulfed in fire.

The duo allegedly left a note explaining their deadly protest days before carrying out the self-immolation.

“We send prayers for long life of Dalai Lama and call for his immediate return,” the note allegedly explained of their self-immolation act.

The two youths described themselves as poorly educated and financially weak to do anything for Tibet’s freedom and termed their self-immolation as their only resort to fight for Tibet’s cause.

The two youth also called on Tibetans to refrain from fighting among themselves and to focus on “unity in order to preserve Tibetan identity and spirit.”

The source said Norphel, son of Lhakpa Dhondup and Tsering Yangchen, hails from the troubled region of Ngaba where most of the reported self-immolation occurred so far. Khedup hails from Thridu County in Yushul Tibet Autonomous Prefecture.

The latest twin self-immolations takes to 41, the number of Tibetans who took to the deadly form of protest since 2009 to challenge China’s rule of their homeland and to call for the return of Dalai Lama.
Last Updated ( 20 June 2012 )

Kalon Tripa to Visit Australia

DHARAMSHALA: Kalon Tripa Dr Lobsang Sangay will visit Australia from 24 June to 1 July.
Kalon Tripa will leave Dharamsala tommorrow for Delhi where he is scheduled to meet some important officials. He will leave Delhi for Australia on 23 June.
During his visits to Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney and Brisbane, Kalon Tripa will meet Members of Parliament, members of think-tank, sponsors, and the media. He will also speak to the Tibetan community based in different parts of the country in Brisbane on 1 July.

Sunday, 17 June 2012

His Holiness the Dalai Lama's appeal to Chinese people in the wake of Tibet unrest

An Appeal to the Chinese People from His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama

Today, I extend heartfelt greetings to my Chinese brothers and sisters round the world, particularly to those in the People's Republic of China. In the light of the recent developments in Tibet, I would like to share with you my thoughts concerning relations between the Tibetan and Chinese peoples, and to make a personal appeal to you all.

I am deeply saddened by the loss of life in the recent tragic events in Tibet. I am aware that some Chinese have also died. I feel for the victims and their families and pray for them. The recent unrest has clearly demonstrated the gravity of the situation in Tibet and the urgent need to seek a peaceful and mutually beneficial solution through dialogue. Even at this juncture I have expressed my willingness to the Chinese authorities to work together to bring about peace and stability. 

Chinese brothers and sisters, I assure you I have no desire to seek Tibet's separation. Nor do I have any wish to drive a wedge between the Tibetan and Chinese peoples. On the contrary my commitment has always been to find a genuine solution to the problem of Tibet that ensures the long-term interests of both Chinese and Tibetans. My primary concern, as I have repeated time and again, is to ensure the survival of the Tibetan people's distinctive culture, language and identity. As a simple monk who strives to live his daily life according to Buddhist precepts, I assure you of the sincerity of my motivation.

I have appealed to the leadership of the PRC to clearly understand my position and work to resolve these problems by "seeking truth from facts." I urge the Chinese leadership to exercise wisdom and to initiate a meaningful dialogue with the Tibetan people. I also appeal to them to make sincere efforts to contribute to the stability and harmony of the PRC and avoid creating rifts between the nationalities. The state media's portrayal of the recent events in Tibet, using deceit and distorted images, could sow the seeds of racial tension with unpredictable long- term consequences. This is of grave concern to me. Similarly, despite my repeated support for the Beijing Olympics, the Chinese authorities, with the intention of creating rift between the Chinese people and myself, assert that I am trying to sabotage the games. I am encouraged, however, that several Chinese intellectuals and scholars have also expressed their strong concern about the Chinese leadership's actions and the potential for adverse long-term consequences, particularly on relations among different nationalities.

Since ancient times, Tibetan and Chinese peoples have lived as neighbors. In the two thousand year-old recorded history of our peoples, we have at times developed friendly relations, even entering into matrimonial alliances, while at other times we fought each other. However, since Buddhism flourished in China first before it arrived in Tibet from India, we Tibetans have historically accorded the Chinese people the respect and affection due to elder Dharma brothers and sisters. This is something well known to members of the Chinese community living outside China, some of whom have attended my Buddhist lectures, as well as pilgrims from mainland China, whom I have had the privilege to meet. I take heart from these meetings and feel they may contribute to a better understanding between our two peoples.

The twentieth century witnessed enormous changes in many parts of the world and Tibet, too, was caught up in this turbulence. Soon after the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949, the People's Liberation Army entered Tibet finally resulting in the 17-Point Agreement concluded between China and Tibet in May 1951. When I was in Beijing in 1954-55, attending the National People's Congress, I had the opportunity to meet and develop a personal friendship with many senior leaders, including Chairman Mao himself. In fact, Chairman Mao gave me advice on numerous issues, as well as personal assurances with regard to the future of Tibet. Encouraged by these assurances, and inspired by the dedication of many of China's revolutionary leaders of the time, I returned to Tibet full of confidence and optimism. Some Tibetan members of the Communist Party also had such a hope. After my return to Lhasa, I made every possible effort to seek genuine autonomy for Tibet within the family of the People's Republic of China (PRC). I believed that this would best serve the long-term interests of both the Tibetan and Chinese peoples.

Unfortunately, tensions, which began to escalate in Tibet from around 1956, eventually led to the peaceful uprising of March 10, 1959, in Lhasa and my eventual escape into exile. Although many positive developments have taken place in Tibet under the PRC's rule, these developments, as the previous Panchen Lama pointed out in January 1989, were overshadowed by immense suffering and extensive destruction. Tibetans were compelled to live in a state of constant fear, while the Chinese government remained suspicious of them. However, instead of cultivating enmity towards the Chinese leaders responsible for the ruthless suppression of the Tibetan people, I prayed for them to become friends, which I expressed in the following lines in a prayer I composed in 1960, a year after I arrived in India: "May they attain the wisdom eye discerning right and wrong, And may they abide in the glory of friendship and love." Many Tibetans, school children among them, recite these lines in their daily prayers.

In 1974, following serious discussions with my Kashag (cabinet), as well as the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker of the then Assembly of the Tibetan People's Deputies, we decided to find a Middle Way that would seek not to separate Tibet from China, but would facilitate the peaceful development of Tibet. Although we had no contact at the time with the PRC - which was in the midst of the Cultural Revolution - we had already recognized that sooner or later, we would have to resolve the question of Tibet through negotiations. We also acknowledged that, at least with regard to modernization and economic development, it would greatly benefit Tibet if it remained within the PRC. Although Tibet has a rich and ancient cultural heritage, it is materially undeveloped.

Situated on the roof of the world, Tibet is the source of many of Asia's major rivers, therefore, protection of the environment on the Tibetan plateau is of supreme importance. Since our utmost concern is to safeguard Tibetan Buddhist culture - rooted as it is in the values of universal compassion - as well as the Tibetan language and the unique Tibetan identity, we have worked whole-heartedly towards achieving meaningful self-rule for all Tibetans. The PRC's constitution provides the right for nationalities such as the Tibetans to do this.

In 1979, the then Chinese paramount leader, Deng Xiaoping assured my personal emissary that "except for the independence of Tibet, all other questions can be negotiated." Since we had already formulated our approach to seeking a solution to the Tibetan issue within the constitution of the PRC, we found ourselves well placed to respond to this new opportunity. My representatives met many times with officials of the PRC. Since renewing our contacts in 2002, we have had six rounds of talks. However, on the fundamental issue, there has been no concrete result at all. Nevertheless, as I have declared many times, I remain firmly committed to the Middle Way approach and reiterate here my willingness to continue to pursue the process of dialogue.

This year the Chinese people are proudly and eagerly awaiting the opening of the Olympic Games. I have, from the start, supported Beijing's being awarded the opportunity to host the Games. My position remains unchanged. China has the world's largest population, a long history and an extremely rich civilization. Today, due to her impressive economic progress, she is emerging as a great power. This is certainly to be welcomed. But China also needs to earn the respect and esteem of the global community through the establishment of an open and harmonious society based on the principles of transparency, freedom, and the rule of law. For example, to this day victims of the Tiananmen Square tragedy that adversely affected the lives of so many Chinese citizens have received neither just redress nor any official response. Similarly, when thousands of ordinary Chinese in rural areas suffer injustice at the hands of exploitative and corrupt local officials, their legitimate complaints are either ignored or met with aggression. I express these concerns both as a fellow human being and as someone who is prepared to consider himself a member of the large family that is the People's Republic of China. In this respect, I appreciate and support President Hu Jintao's policy of creating a "harmonious society", but this can only arise on the basis of mutual trust and an atmosphere of freedom, including freedom of speech and the rule of law. I strongly believe that if these values are embraced, many important problems relating to minority nationalities can be resolved, such as the issue of Tibet, as well as Eastern Turkistan, and Inner Mongolia, where the native people now constitute only 20% of a total population of 24 million.

I had hoped President Hu Jintao's recent statement that the stability and safety of Tibet concerns the stability and safety of the country might herald the dawning of a new era for the resolution of the problem of Tibet. It is unfortunate that despite my sincere efforts not to separate Tibet from China, the leaders of the PRC continue to accuse me of being a "separatist". Similarly, when Tibetans in Lhasa and many other areas spontaneously protested to express their deep-rooted resentment, the Chinese authorities immediately accused me of having orchestrated their demonstrations. I have called for a thorough investigation by a respected body to look into this allegation.

Chinese brothers and sisters - wherever you may be - with deep concern I appeal to you to help dispel the misunderstandings between our two communities. Moreover, I appeal to you to help us find a peaceful, lasting solution to the problem of Tibet through dialogue in the spirit of understanding and accommodation.


With my prayers,

Dalai Lama

March 28, 2008

Note: translated from the Tibetan origina

China Admits Challenges to Human Rights Protection

On 11 June 2012, China announced its second National Human Rights Action Plan (NHRAP)1 for the years 2012 to 2015 saying it has a ‘long way to go before fully allowing people to enjoy human right.’

The new plan also highlighted religious freedom stating that the Chinese government will ‘protect religious activities in accordance with the law,’ reported Xinhua, the official Chinese news agency. Like the NHRAP (2009-2010), the new document guarantees state protection for a host of civil and political rights, as well as economic, social and cultural rights.

The NHRAP (2009-2010) was the Chinese government’s first formal document that ‘guaranteed’ human rights to Chinese citizens and pledged to address human rights violations in the People’s Republic of China.

It is difficult to say whether this new plan will bring any real improvement in the human rights situation in Tibet and China. Given the dismal performance during the first plan period, any early expectations might end up being premature and naively optimistic. The NHRAP (2009-2010) generated some enthusiasm and expectation among human rights activists, who called it a giant step forward in the right direction, and expressed hope that the document’s provisions would be implemented to improve the dismal state of human rights in the PRC and not remain just another tool for external propaganda. But despair set in by the end of the plan period. There was no notable change in the human rights situation in Tibet or China.

On 14 July 2011, the State Council Information Office of the PRC issued the Assessment Report on the NHRAP (2009-2010), prepared by a group of officially approved experts and scholars. The report called the government’s performance during the action plan period a success saying all provisions and guarantees made in the plan were implemented within the two-year time frame.

In 2010, TCHRD reported a total of 831 known political prisoners in Tibet out of which 188 were arrested in the same year. In 2009, TCHRD managed to identify the names of some 2,000 Tibetans out of estimated 6,500 who had been arrested, detained and released since March 2008. TCHRD’s Annual Report 2009 called the year one of the worst years for religious freedom in Tibet.

In 2010, from 18 to 20 January, the Central Committee of Communist Party of China (CPC) and the State Council convened the Fifth Tibet Work Forum, a high-level strategy meeting to decide on policy outlines for Tibet from 2010-2020. The Fifth Tibet Work Forum adopted a two-pronged strategy on Tibet: to promote ‘leap forward development’ and to ‘maintain long-term stability’ in Tibet. After the meeting, the scale and intensity of repressive official practices have deepened in Tibet as the authorities continue to ‘strike harder’ than before. It is now official priority to identify and ‘strike hard’ on causes of instability, to thoroughly deepen the campaign of patriotic re-education and legal education particularly in the monastic communities, to regulate the monastic activities and religious practices according to domestic laws and party directives.

From 20-21 August 2010, the Ministry of Public Security held a meeting in Lhasa on the public security work situation in Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) and Tibetan areas in Chinese provinces of Qinghai, Sichuan, Gansu, and Yunnan. Decisions taken at the meeting included cracking down hard on separatist activities, promoting development and protecting stability, intensifying border control and restricting travel movements. It was also decided to upgrade the uniforms, gadgets, tools, and weaponry of the Public Security personnel.

From 14 to 15 August 2010, in Shigatse (Chinese: Xigaze) Prefecture, TAR, the Central Committee of the United Front Work Department of the CPC held a meeting to discuss the work situation in Tibetan monastic community. On 30 September 2010, the TAR Religious Affairs Bureau issued a 44-point regulation called 'Management Measures for Tibetan Buddhist Monasteries and Temples’ to further control monastic activities. Also known as Order No. 8, the regulation went into effect on 1 November 2010. It is aimed at creating clear distance between monastic institutions in Tibet and ‘foreign influence’ and 'separatist activities'. These regulations have violated the Tibetan people’s right to religious freedom, which is one of the non-derogable rights enshrined in major international human rights conventions.

A 2011 study by Human Rights Watch pointed out that by 2009, per capita annual spending on public security in Ngaba had reached 779 RMB, five times the average spent per person on public security in non-Tibetan areas in Sichuan Province. The report attributes high security spending to self-immolation protests, adding, ‘heavy-handed security exacerbates [Tibetan] grievances, desperation.’ China’s overall planned domestic security spending is higher than its external security budget.

tchrd

Tuesday, 5 June 2012

Tuesday, 29 May 2012

Tibet at a Glance




The term TIBET here means the whole of Tibet known as Cholka-Sum (U-Tsang, Kham and Amdo). It includes the present-day Chinese administrative areas of the so-called Tibet Autonomous Region, Qinghai Province, two Tibetan Autonomous Prefectures and one Tibetan Autonomous County in Sichuan Province, one Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture and one Tibetan Autonomous County in Gansu Province and one Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Yunnan Province.
Land Size: 2.5 million square kilometres, which includes U-Tsang, Kham and Amdo provinces. “Tibet Autonomous Region”, consisting of U-Tsang and a small portion of Kham, consists of 1.2 million square kilometres. The bulk of Tibet lies outside the “TAR”.
Political Status: Occupied country and without United Nations’ representation.
Average Altitude: 4,000 metres or 13,000 feet above sea level.
Administration: Under Chinese rule, Tibet is divided into the following administrative units: a) Tibet Autonomous Region, b) Qinghai Province, c) Tianzu Tibetan Autonomous County and Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Gansu Province, d) Aba Tibetan-Qiang Autonomous Prefecture, Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture and Mili Tibetan Autonomous County in Sichuan Province, e) Dechen Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Yunnan Province.
Population: The total Tibetan population in Tibet is 6 million. Of them, 2.09 million live in the “TAR” and the rest in the Tibetan areas outside the “TAR”.
Major Rivers: Yarlung Tsangpo (Brahmaputra in India), Machu (Yellow River in China), Drichu (Yangtse in China), Senge Khabab (Indus in India), Phungchu (Arun in India), Gyalmo Ngulchu (Salween in Burma) and Zachu (Mekong in Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos).
Native Wildlife: Tibetan antelope, wild yak, wild ass and Tibetan argali, blue sheep, black-necked crane, Tibetan gazelle, giant panda, red panda, golden monkey.
Economy: Agriculture and animal husbandry.
Literacy Rate: Approximately 25 per cent.

Monday, 28 May 2012


Let us stand united and call China to free Tibet.